overlaylink

It’s the Season of the Witch: Where Did the Stereotype Come From?

Taylor Rebhan
October 23, 2024 | 4 min read

From literature to film and pop culture, nothing screams Halloween quite like the legendary witch — and all that comes with her. Black cats. Flying brooms. Potions, cauldrons, knobbly noses, and spellbooks abound.

But what’s up with this ancient caricature? Is it grounded in reality, or is it all just a bunch of hocus pocus?

The history of witches long predates Halloween, as well as the Celtic tradition the modern holiday is rooted in. East to West, North to South, you’d be hard pressed to find a cultural record that doesn’t have its own tradition of witches.

Witchcraft Is Ancient

In fact, witches can be found in some of our earliest written texts.

Both the Judeo-Christian Old Testament and even earlier Mesopotamian clay tablets reference witches as literal figures in human history — not just characters in fiction. These ancient religious documents served warnings about the power of witches and their use of unsanctioned magic to bring about unsavory events.

Now, witches weren’t the only figures using magic in these tomes. But they were specifically called out for using the wrong type of magic — anything that the authors deemed unacceptable.

This is a pattern repeated for thousands of years. It’s not tongue of newt or dead man’s toe that adds a particularly unsavory flavor to the history of witches. No, it’s just straight-up moral panic, and the scapegoating that comes with it.

It’s not tongue of newt or dead man’s toe that adds a particularly unsavory flavor to the history of witches. No, it’s just straight-up moral panic, and the scapegoating that comes with it.

Before we knew much about microbes and mental health, unseen phenomena were explained through magic and religion. Who can blame us? Superstition and intuition were all we had to go on in ancient times. So we chalked up positive events to our deities and good magic, and misfortune and tragedy to malevolent forces, or black magic.

Who practices black magic? Well, maybe the shaman with the unconventional beliefs about health and healing. Or maybe the lippy old hag who defies the male elders in the tribe.

Why settle for explanations out of our control when we could pin misfortune on someone we have beef with? Time and time again, history shows there’s no one in society ripe for a good old-fashioned pillory quite like an opinionated woman.

Crops failed? Cow died? Husband had an affair with the milk maid? Grab the pitchforks and your biggest dunking tub — we’re going witch-hunting.

Time and time again, history shows there’s no one in society ripe for a good old-fashioned pillory quite like an opinionated woman.

A Few Of Her Favorite Things

OK, so we’ve established the background of witches: supernatural scapegoats with ancient magic origins that are more often than not victims of rabid misogyny. But what about her occult accoutrement?

Spells, potions, and bonfires with the Devil make sense. They’ve long been associated with black magic.

Warts, crooked noses, and an obsession with eternal youth? Sign up for your local university’s Gender Studies Program for your primer on portrayals of women in media.

Iconography like brooms and cats, however, call for more speculation.

This is where fact and fiction blend into folklore. Was the image of a broomstick taken from a witch-hunter observing a Pagan harvest ritual? Or was it just a burst of imagination from an aspiring demonologist with a penchant against housework? Either way, the originator had no idea the impact his creative liberty would have on pop culture.

Not all stereotypes are of such dubious origin, however. There are some scientific lenses we can retroactively apply to illogical leaps of lore. Take the ties between cats and witches. Neil DeGrasse Tyson explained it succinctly in a recent podcast: Some women who were mysteriously — ahem, magically — impervious to the plague happened to be cat owners.

Laymen of the time might cry, “Witch!” But we know now that plagues were transferred by fleas via rats. And if there’s one way to clear your house of rodents, it’s a feline companion. Add a few hundred years of Dark Ages illiteracy and a dash of paranoid misogyny, and you’ve got a classic stereotype.

So, take scientific ignorance and throw it in a cauldron with religious fearmongering. Top it off with deep-rooted hatred of women, and you’ve got the nasty potion that led to our current caricature of witches.

Take scientific ignorance and throw it in a cauldron with religious fearmongering. Top it off with deep-rooted hatred of women, and you’ve got the nasty potion that led to our current caricature of witches.

The good news? In our more enlightened age, writers of all stripes are reclaiming the story of the witch. From Broadway — think Wicked — to the silver screen — Robert Egger’s The VVitch — the oft-maligned witch is staging her renaissance as a figure to be both revered and respectfully feared.

More and more often, we’re exploring the hysteria with a critical eye toward the power structures of the time … and our current realities.

More and more often, we’re exploring the hysteria with a critical eye toward the power structures of the time … and our current realities.

Witches still have a chokehold on art and literature today because they reflect our fears back at us:

Our lack of control over the chaos of the universe;

Our feeble defenses against disease and misfortune;

Our tendency to point the finger — to accuse, rather than accept.

And maybe that’s the role these indelible figures play in our collective story.

The scariest thing about a witch isn’t what’s bubbling inside her cauldron. It’s what boils and roils in our own souls.

January 28, 2026 1 min read

Write every day with the Freewrite team in February.

January 09, 2026 2 min read

A new year means a whole new crop of work is entering the public domain. And that means endless opportunities for retellings, spoofs, adaptations, and fan fiction.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources