overlaylink

It’s the Season of the Witch: Where Did the Stereotype Come From?

Taylor Rebhan
October 23, 2024 | 4 min read

From literature to film and pop culture, nothing screams Halloween quite like the legendary witch — and all that comes with her. Black cats. Flying brooms. Potions, cauldrons, knobbly noses, and spellbooks abound.

But what’s up with this ancient caricature? Is it grounded in reality, or is it all just a bunch of hocus pocus?

The history of witches long predates Halloween, as well as the Celtic tradition the modern holiday is rooted in. East to West, North to South, you’d be hard pressed to find a cultural record that doesn’t have its own tradition of witches.

Witchcraft Is Ancient

In fact, witches can be found in some of our earliest written texts.

Both the Judeo-Christian Old Testament and even earlier Mesopotamian clay tablets reference witches as literal figures in human history — not just characters in fiction. These ancient religious documents served warnings about the power of witches and their use of unsanctioned magic to bring about unsavory events.

Now, witches weren’t the only figures using magic in these tomes. But they were specifically called out for using the wrong type of magic — anything that the authors deemed unacceptable.

This is a pattern repeated for thousands of years. It’s not tongue of newt or dead man’s toe that adds a particularly unsavory flavor to the history of witches. No, it’s just straight-up moral panic, and the scapegoating that comes with it.

It’s not tongue of newt or dead man’s toe that adds a particularly unsavory flavor to the history of witches. No, it’s just straight-up moral panic, and the scapegoating that comes with it.

Before we knew much about microbes and mental health, unseen phenomena were explained through magic and religion. Who can blame us? Superstition and intuition were all we had to go on in ancient times. So we chalked up positive events to our deities and good magic, and misfortune and tragedy to malevolent forces, or black magic.

Who practices black magic? Well, maybe the shaman with the unconventional beliefs about health and healing. Or maybe the lippy old hag who defies the male elders in the tribe.

Why settle for explanations out of our control when we could pin misfortune on someone we have beef with? Time and time again, history shows there’s no one in society ripe for a good old-fashioned pillory quite like an opinionated woman.

Crops failed? Cow died? Husband had an affair with the milk maid? Grab the pitchforks and your biggest dunking tub — we’re going witch-hunting.

Time and time again, history shows there’s no one in society ripe for a good old-fashioned pillory quite like an opinionated woman.

A Few Of Her Favorite Things

OK, so we’ve established the background of witches: supernatural scapegoats with ancient magic origins that are more often than not victims of rabid misogyny. But what about her occult accoutrement?

Spells, potions, and bonfires with the Devil make sense. They’ve long been associated with black magic.

Warts, crooked noses, and an obsession with eternal youth? Sign up for your local university’s Gender Studies Program for your primer on portrayals of women in media.

Iconography like brooms and cats, however, call for more speculation.

This is where fact and fiction blend into folklore. Was the image of a broomstick taken from a witch-hunter observing a Pagan harvest ritual? Or was it just a burst of imagination from an aspiring demonologist with a penchant against housework? Either way, the originator had no idea the impact his creative liberty would have on pop culture.

Not all stereotypes are of such dubious origin, however. There are some scientific lenses we can retroactively apply to illogical leaps of lore. Take the ties between cats and witches. Neil DeGrasse Tyson explained it succinctly in a recent podcast: Some women who were mysteriously — ahem, magically — impervious to the plague happened to be cat owners.

Laymen of the time might cry, “Witch!” But we know now that plagues were transferred by fleas via rats. And if there’s one way to clear your house of rodents, it’s a feline companion. Add a few hundred years of Dark Ages illiteracy and a dash of paranoid misogyny, and you’ve got a classic stereotype.

So, take scientific ignorance and throw it in a cauldron with religious fearmongering. Top it off with deep-rooted hatred of women, and you’ve got the nasty potion that led to our current caricature of witches.

Take scientific ignorance and throw it in a cauldron with religious fearmongering. Top it off with deep-rooted hatred of women, and you’ve got the nasty potion that led to our current caricature of witches.

The good news? In our more enlightened age, writers of all stripes are reclaiming the story of the witch. From Broadway — think Wicked — to the silver screen — Robert Egger’s The VVitch — the oft-maligned witch is staging her renaissance as a figure to be both revered and respectfully feared.

More and more often, we’re exploring the hysteria with a critical eye toward the power structures of the time … and our current realities.

More and more often, we’re exploring the hysteria with a critical eye toward the power structures of the time … and our current realities.

Witches still have a chokehold on art and literature today because they reflect our fears back at us:

Our lack of control over the chaos of the universe;

Our feeble defenses against disease and misfortune;

Our tendency to point the finger — to accuse, rather than accept.

And maybe that’s the role these indelible figures play in our collective story.

The scariest thing about a witch isn’t what’s bubbling inside her cauldron. It’s what boils and roils in our own souls.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources

December 18, 2025 7 min read

What can Jane Austen's personal letters teach writers of today?

December 10, 2025 6 min read

Singer-songwriter Abner James finds his creativity in the quiet freedom of analog tools. Learn how his creative process transcends different media.

Abner James went to school for film directing. But the success of the band he and his brother formed together, Eighty Ninety, knocked him onto a different trajectory.

The band has accrued more than 40 million streams since the release of their debut EP “Elizabeth," and their work was even co-signed by Taylor Swift when the singer added Eighty Ninety to her playlist "Songs Taylor Loves.”

Now, Abner is returning to long-form writing in addition to songwriting, and with a change in media comes an examination of the creative process. We sat down to chat about what's the same — and what's different. 

ANNIE COSBY: Tell us about your songwriting process.

ABNER JAMES: The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off.

And one of the things that occurred to me when I was traveling, actually, was that I would love to be able to do that but from a writing perspective. What would happen if I sat down and approached writing in the same way that I approached music? In a more intuitive and free-form kind of way? What would that dig up?

AC: That's basically the ethos of Freewrite.

AJ: Yes. We had just put out a record, and I was thinking about how to get into writing for the next one. It occurred to me that regardless of how I started, I always finished on a screen. And I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?

Where there's not blue light hitting me in the face. Even if I'm using my Notes app, it's the same thing. It really gets me into a different mindset.

 "I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?"

I grew up playing piano. That was my first instrument. And I found an old typewriter at a thrift store, and I love it. It actually reminded me a lot of playing piano, the kind of physical, the feeling of it. And it was really fun, but pretty impractical, especially because I travel a fair amount.

And so I wondered, is there such a thing as a digital typewriter? And I googled it, and I found Freewrite.

AC: What about Freewrite helps you write?

AJ:I think, pragmatically, just the E Ink screen is a huge deal, because it doesn't exhaust me in the same way. And the idea of having a tool specifically set aside for the process is appealing in an aesthetic way but also a mental-emotional way. When it comes out, it's kind of like ... It's like having an office you work out of. It's just for that.

"The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off."

And all of the pragmatic limitations — like you're not getting texts on it, and you're not doing all that stuff on the internet — that's really helpful, too. But just having the mindset....

When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing. I find that to be really cool and inspiring.

"When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing."

AC: So mentally it gets you ready for writing.

AJ: Yeah, and also, when you write a Microsoft Word, it looks so finished that it's hard to keep going. If every time I strummed a chord, I was hearing it back, mixed and mastered and produced...?

It's hard to stay in that space when I'm seeing it fully written out and formatted in, like, Times New Roman, looking all seriously back at me.

AC: I get that. I have terrible instincts to edit stuff over and over again and never finish a story.

AJ:  Also, the way you just open it and it's ready to go. So you don't have the stages of the computer turning on, that kind of puts this pressure, this tension on.

It's working at the edges in all these different ways that on their own could feel a little bit like it's not really necessary. All these amorphous things where you could look at it and be like, well, I don't really need any of those. But they add up to a critical mass that actually is significant.

And sometimes, if I want to bring it on a plane, I've found it's replaced reading for me. Rather than pick up a book or bring a book on the plane, I bring Traveler and just kind of hang out in that space and see if anything comes up.

I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise. I've found that writing from words towards music, I get different kinds of songs than I have in the past, which has been interesting.

In that way, like sitting at a piano, you just write differently than you do on a guitar, or even a bass, because of the things those instruments tend to encourage or that they can do.

It feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me.

"I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise... [Traveler] feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me."

AC: As someone who doesn't know the first thing about writing music, that's fascinating. It's all magic to me.

AJ: Yeah.

AC: What else are you interested in writing?

AJ: I went to school for film directing. That was kind of what I thought I was going to do. And then my brother and I started the band and that kind of happened first and knocked me onto a different track for a little while after college.

Growing up, though, writing was my way into everything. In directing, I wanted to be in control of the thing that I wrote. And in music, it was the same — the songwriting really feels like it came from that same place. And then the idea of writing longer form, like fiction, almost feels just like the next step from song to EP to album to novel.

For whatever reason, that started feeling like a challenge that would be deeply related to the kinds of work that we do in the studio.

AC: Do you have any advice for aspiring songwriters?

AJ: This sounds like a cliche, but it's totally true: whatever success that I've had as a songwriter — judge that for yourself — but whatever success I have had, has been directly proportional to just writing the song that I wanted to hear.

What I mean by that is, even if you're being coldly, cynically, late-stage capitalist about it, it's by far the most success I've had. The good news is that you don't have to choose. And in fact, when you start making those little compromises, or even begin to inch in that direction, it just doesn't work. So you can forget about it.

Just make music you want to hear. And that will be the music that resonates with most people.

I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake. They're not real. None of those people are actually real people. You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one.

And I just don't think that we're that different, in the end. So that would be my advice.

AC: That seems like generally great creative advice. Because fiction writers talk about that too, right? Do you write to market or do you write the book you want to read. Same thing. And that imaginary focus group has been debilitating for me. I have to silence that focus group before I can write.

AJ: Absolutely.

"I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake... You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one."

--

Learn more about Abner James, his brother, and their band, Eighty Ninety, on Instagram.